Error message

  • Notice: Undefined offset: 223 in user_node_load() (line 3697 of /home/tcipgpro/public_html/modules/user/user.module).
  • Notice: Trying to get property 'name' of non-object in user_node_load() (line 3697 of /home/tcipgpro/public_html/modules/user/user.module).
  • Notice: Undefined offset: 223 in user_node_load() (line 3698 of /home/tcipgpro/public_html/modules/user/user.module).
  • Notice: Trying to get property 'picture' of non-object in user_node_load() (line 3698 of /home/tcipgpro/public_html/modules/user/user.module).
  • Notice: Undefined offset: 223 in user_node_load() (line 3699 of /home/tcipgpro/public_html/modules/user/user.module).
  • Notice: Trying to get property 'data' of non-object in user_node_load() (line 3699 of /home/tcipgpro/public_html/modules/user/user.module).
  • Notice: Undefined offset: 223 in user_node_load() (line 3697 of /home/tcipgpro/public_html/modules/user/user.module).
  • Notice: Trying to get property 'name' of non-object in user_node_load() (line 3697 of /home/tcipgpro/public_html/modules/user/user.module).
  • Notice: Undefined offset: 223 in user_node_load() (line 3698 of /home/tcipgpro/public_html/modules/user/user.module).
  • Notice: Trying to get property 'picture' of non-object in user_node_load() (line 3698 of /home/tcipgpro/public_html/modules/user/user.module).
  • Notice: Undefined offset: 223 in user_node_load() (line 3699 of /home/tcipgpro/public_html/modules/user/user.module).
  • Notice: Trying to get property 'data' of non-object in user_node_load() (line 3699 of /home/tcipgpro/public_html/modules/user/user.module).

Enforcing Safety and Consistency Constraints in Policy-Based Authorization Systems

Lee, A. J., Winslett, M.
Citation:

ACM Transactions on Information and System Security 12, 2, Article 8 (December 2008), 33 pages, 2008.

Visit Publisher Online Entry:
Abstract:

In trust negotiation and other forms of distributed proving, networked entities cooperate to form proofs of authorization that are justified by collections of certified attribute credentials. These attributes may be obtained through interactions with any number of external entities and are collected and validated over an extended period of time. Although these collections of credentials in some ways resemble partial system snapshots, current trust negotiation and distributed proving systems lack the notion of a consistent global state in which the satisfaction of authorization policies should be checked. In this article, we argue that unlike the notions of consistency studied in other areas of distributed computing, the level of consistency required during policy evaluation is predicated solely upon the security requirements of the policy evaluator. As such, there is little incentive for entities to participate in complicated consistency preservation schemes like those used in distributed computing, distributed databases, and distributed shared memory. We go on to show that the most intuitive notion of consistency fails to provide basic safety guarantees under certain circumstances and then propose several more refined notions of consistency that provide stronger safety guarantees. We provide algorithms that allow each of these refined notions of consistency to be attained in practice with minimal overheads and formally prove several security and privacy properties of these algorithms. Lastly, we explore the notion of strategic design trade-offs in the consistency enforcement algorithm space and propose several modifications to the core algorithms presented in this article. These modifications enhance the privacy-preservation or completeness properties of these algorithms without altering the consistency constraints that they enforce.

Publication Status:
Published
Publication Type:
Journal Article
Publication Date:
12/01/2008
Copyright Notice:

This material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders. All persons copying this information are expected to adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright. In most cases, these works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.

  1. The following copyright notice applies to all of the above items that appear in IEEE publications: "Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/publish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from IEEE."

  2. The following copyright notice applies to all of the above items that appear in ACM publications: "© ACM, effective the year of publication shown in the bibliographic information. This file is the author’s version of the work. It is posted here by permission of ACM for your personal use. Not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in the journal or proceedings indicated in the bibliographic data for each item."

  3. The following copyright notice applies to all of the above items that appear in IFAC publications: "Document is being reproduced under permission of the Copyright Holder. Use or reproduction of the Document is for informational or personal use only."